Congressman Ed Markey Fights to Help persons with Sensory Disabilities Keep up With Video and Telecommunications Technologies
May 27th, 2008On May 1, Congress’s Subcommittee On Telecommunications and the Internet held a hearing on the Twenty-first Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act. This bill is currently in discussion draft form and is being sponsored by Representative Ed Markey (D. MA) who chairs the Subcommittee. The hearing consisted of powerful testimony from blind and deaf advocates. Of particular note was some very moving testimony from Jesse Acosta, a Sergeant Major who was recently wounded in Iraq. His wounds resulted in blindness and brain injuries. He made note of things that he used to be able to do easily that are now very difficult due to inaccessibility of cell phones and video equipment. The hearing demonstrated that Markey will do all that he can to see that current and emerging technologies will be required to be made accessible to persons with disabilities. To listen to the hearing, go to hearing on twenty-first century telecommunications and video accessibility act and click on the “connect to hearing” link. (Note that there is a period of silence before you hear Mr. Markey Gavel the beginning of the hearing. He states right up front that he believes this is one of the most important hearings to take place in this Congressional session.)
If passed, the Twenty-first Century Communications and Video
Accessibility Act would:
- Require Voice Over Internet Protocol telephones to be accessible to persons with sensory disabilities;
- Require a minimum level of video description as proscribed in Federal Communications commission regulations that were struck down in a 2002 court decision;
- Require both captions and descriptions for internet videos and;
- Require that all video devices including DVD players, cable boxes, digital video recorders and satellite receivers be accessible for persons with sensory disabilities.
A relatively new disability coalition has been working closely with Markey and industry representatives in order to foster greater communication among the various factions while improving accessibility to these technologies. IT is called the Coalition of Organizations for Accessible Technology, (COAT.) COAT is made up of various organizations promoting accessibility for persons who are deaf and blind. Blindness organizations that are members of COAT include the American Foundation for the Blind and the American Council of the blind. To learn more about the bill, go to afb blog on telecommunications bill, or www.coataccess.org.
Let’s take a quick look at why this bill is of utmost importance. Firstly, there’s the coming obsolescence of VHS videotapes and its impact on the availability of movies with video description. Since the early 1990’s WGBH of Boston has promoted and sold VHS tapes of audio described movies. The catalog of over 300 available titles ranged from newer comedies and dramas to classics from back in the 1940’s. On May 12, WGBH ended sales of VHS titles. Hollywood studios are no-longer manufacturing VHS tapes for sale or rental. The VHS tape is going the way of the vinyl record to be replaced by DVDs. While there is no doubt that the DVD is vastly superior to the VHS tape, there are not many DVDs with description. This is ironic given the proliferation of first-run movies playing in theaters equipped with infrared sound systems and headsets for the blind along with rear window captioning for the deaf. It is truly unfortunate that these description tracks rarely find their way onto the DVD versions of these movies. WGBH is fighting an uphill battle to get the motion picture industry to include the DVD tracks. The motion picture industry claims that there is not enough memory on the DVD discs to add description tracks. If that is the case, I see no reason why movies cannot be produced using two discs—one for the movie with description and another for all the bonus material.
To learn more about efforts to increase the amount of video description, try the following links:
To contact movie studios to advocate for more description, try Hollywood studios
Secondly, newer home entertainment technology has gotten much harder for people who are blind or visually impaired to use independently. Twenty or thirty years ago, you could bring home that new TV or VCR, have someone read you the basics from the users guide and begin enjoying your new purchase. Operation of these units was relatively straightforward with knobs that clicked when you changed the channel. Even the first TVs with remote controls were relatively easy to learn to use. Today’s televisions and DVD players all have onscreen menus that you must use to set up and operate them. Naturally, these menus are not accessible. Similarly, digital recorders and onscreen TV guides offered by cable companies are equally inaccessible.
Finally there’s the conversion from analog to digital television. Beginning on February 17, 2009, all broadcasts will be digital. This means that if you have an older analog television with no cable you will get nothing but white noise. You will need a digital TV, a digital cable or satellite receiver or an analog to digital converter box. What will this all mean for reception of video description? Given the track record of the broadcast industry, which fought regulations requiring video description, I wouldn’t expect to receive video descriptions after the conversion is complete unless this bill or something similar becomes law. For a detailed analysis of how conversion to digital television will impact the availability of video description, go to Audio Description International.
Let us all work together to pass the Twenty-first Century Communications and Video
Accessibility Act, which would bring us one step closer to my dream of universal design. For more on my dream, go to carroll center blog on AT&T and universal design
Information for this blog was taken from the coalition of Organizations for Accessible Technology, WGBH, Audio Description International and the Boston Globe. To read the Globe article, go to globe article on telecommunications bill

