<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Six-Key Compatibility Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.carrolltech.org/archives/16/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.carrolltech.org/archives/16</link>
	<description>A Carroll Tech blog about Accessibility</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://blog.carrolltech.org/archives/16#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 19:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.carrolltech.org/archives/16#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Wow!  Yes.  I see what you mean.  I think the test is probably sufficient.  Are there enough people doing this to justify an expending of a lot of resources to create and track this information?  Now, if this were part of an overall clearinghouse of accessibility and blindness technology related information?  That might be a different story!     </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  Yes.  I see what you mean.  I think the test is probably sufficient.  Are there enough people doing this to justify an expending of a lot of resources to create and track this information?  Now, if this were part of an overall clearinghouse of accessibility and blindness technology related information?  That might be a different story!     </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanie</title>
		<link>http://blog.carrolltech.org/archives/16#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 02:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.carrolltech.org/archives/16#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Hi Darrell.   My first reaction to your comment was "Yeah, in a perfect world."  After all, there are an awful lot of keyboard manufacturers, each producing a steady stream of new models.  And there are not a lot of people who need to be able to six-key.  On the few occasions I've seen such a list floating around, I've been struck at how short and dated the list is.

My second reaction to your comment is this:  In light of the six-key compatibility test, what would it take to generate such a list and keep it up to date?  Hypothetically, let's say you or I create a web-based form through which a user could submit his/her keyboard details.  If we sent out an email to various individuals and lists, briefly explaining the test and asking for reports, do you think many people would reply?  If so, then let's do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Darrell.   My first reaction to your comment was &#8220;Yeah, in a perfect world.&#8221;  After all, there are an awful lot of keyboard manufacturers, each producing a steady stream of new models.  And there are not a lot of people who need to be able to six-key.  On the few occasions I&#8217;ve seen such a list floating around, I&#8217;ve been struck at how short and dated the list is.</p>
<p>My second reaction to your comment is this:  In light of the six-key compatibility test, what would it take to generate such a list and keep it up to date?  Hypothetically, let&#8217;s say you or I create a web-based form through which a user could submit his/her keyboard details.  If we sent out an email to various individuals and lists, briefly explaining the test and asking for reports, do you think many people would reply?  If so, then let&#8217;s do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://blog.carrolltech.org/archives/16#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.carrolltech.org/archives/16#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Hi JD,

This is definitely a neat and useful test.  Wouldn't it also make sense to provide the manufacturer and model number information for keyboards known to work?  That way, people needing six key Braille entry could just order with confidence?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JD,</p>
<p>This is definitely a neat and useful test.  Wouldn&#8217;t it also make sense to provide the manufacturer and model number information for keyboards known to work?  That way, people needing six key Braille entry could just order with confidence?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
